Skip to content

About This Site

Why I Started AI Doctor Tools

I'm a physician who spent years watching vendors pitch AI products to my colleagues with polished demos and vague claims about "efficiency gains." The slide decks looked great. The peer-reviewed evidence, when it existed at all, told a different story. I started AI Doctor Tools because doctors deserve straightforward information about what these tools actually do in a clinical setting, not what a sales team says they do.

My background is in clinical practice, not software sales. I evaluate AI tools the same way I evaluate any intervention: what does the evidence show, what are the failure modes, and does it actually help the patient in front of me? If a tool works well for clinical documentation but hallucinates drug interactions, you'll read about both.

What We Cover

The site is organized around the areas where AI is making real inroads in medicine: Clinical AI (diagnostic support, imaging analysis, clinical decision tools), Practice Management (scheduling, billing, documentation automation), Patient Care (communication tools, patient education, remote monitoring), and Prompts (tested templates for medical-specific tasks like drafting referral letters or summarizing patient histories).

Every review states what was tested and how. If I used a tool's free trial for a week and ran it against sample cases, I say that. If I only reviewed published validation studies and the vendor's documentation, I say that too. No one should confuse a press release summary with hands-on testing.

How We Make Money

Some links on this site are affiliate links. When you sign up for a tool through one of those links, we may earn a commission from the vendor. This is the standard affiliate model, and I want to be direct about how it works here.

Affiliate relationships never influence our reviews, ratings, or rankings. We test tools ourselves and report what we find. A tool that pays higher commissions does not get a better score. A tool that pays nothing still gets covered if it's relevant to physicians. The editorial process is completely separate from the business side.

If a link is an affiliate link, it is marked. If a tool was provided to us for free for testing purposes, that is disclosed in the review. There are no hidden arrangements.

Editorial Standards

  • No sponsored content without disclosure. If a vendor pays for a placement, it will be clearly labeled as sponsored. This has not happened yet.
  • No pay-for-play rankings. Tool rankings are based on our testing and published evidence, not on who pays the most. Period.
  • No lead selling. We do not collect your information to pass along to software vendors.
  • No clinical advice. This site evaluates AI tools and workflows. Nothing here replaces clinical judgment, board certification, or the standard of care for your patients.
  • Corrections welcome. If we get something wrong about a tool's capabilities, pricing, or evidence base, we want to know. Accuracy matters more than being first.

Who Runs This

AI Doctor Tools is a single-editor publication. I am not affiliated with any AI vendor, EHR company, or hospital system. The goal is simple: give physicians the honest, evidence-aware analysis they need to make informed decisions about AI in their practice, without the marketing noise.

Questions, corrections, or suggestions? Reach us at [email protected].

This page was last updated February 2026.